Pianoteq delay7/11/2023 ![]() In theory, my room should be out of the equation - while it's not a perfect room, it's reasonably good, and I know what a physical piano sounds like in that room. So, given Pianoteq must be designed for the best (=flattest) monitors, why would lower-end monitors with a more limited response sound more real?ģ. ![]() For comparison, I previously used a set of *much lower-end* 4-inch M-Audio AV40s, and they actually sounded better (more like a real piano in the same room), except they couldn't produce the volume of a real piano without distorting. So, I should leave the EQ setting in Pianoteq untouched for the most realistic results, right? If the precision-engineering of Pianoteq is anything to go by, the designers would have designed it to sound most realistic on a set of flat-response monitors with no EQ adjustment, right?Ģ. However, my BX8a speakers are reasonably high-end studio monitors, and should have quite a flat response. My first guess would be the frequency curve of my speakers is suspect. It sounds electronic/"midi" in a way that I can't put my finger on.ġ. I'm half-way comfortable with the sound (way better than your average sample-based MIDI setup), but I'm having real trouble getting it to sound anything like the piano is *right there in front of me*. I've been hugely impressed with Pianoteq, and currently have it hooked up to my Casio PX-3 and M-Audio BX8a studio monitors, positioned as specified, in a room with acceptable acoustic behaviour.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |